Monday, December 21, 2009
Everyone loses
Typically and philosophically, I am opposed to any more government regulation than it takes to keep order and maintain a level playing field. That is primarily because I have seen big government regulate good industries right into the ground. Take broadcasting. Specifically radio broadcasting.
Some regulation is absolutely necessary. If anyone could go buy a transmitter and start broadcasting, the airwaves would be chaos. See "Citizens' Band." But when the Federal Communications Commission deemed it wise to allow an owner to buy many, many signals in a single market, they condoned commoditization of limited spectrum space and effectively shut out good, creative--but not so wealthy--owners. Sure some of those small owners made out like bandits (assuming they got cash and are not holding paper!). See those big guys had to buy every available signal to fill out their portfolios--whether they were a viable station or not--all to assure stockholders, boards of directors, and Wall Street analysts that they were poised to grow.
I'm not the only one who thinks that kind of deregulation is destructive. Many who were forced out of radio by the cost-cutting weasels and their slash-costs-until-you-are-profitable mentality agree, as you might expect. Shareholders of such hollow "media companies" as Citadel should be complaining the loudest. Those geniuses have managed to take a decent lineup of radio stations and fly them nose first into the ground. (They declared bankruptcy over the weekend. That's right. Over the weekend! That is so typical as to be stereotypical!).
Here--from a broadcasting trade report today--is another lone voice in the wilderness:
“The fruits of deregulation are now clear – everyone loses”, says Connecticut station owner Dennis Jackson. He says “the big story of 2009 is the ultimate comeuppance of impending bankruptcy being earned by the big three plundering conglomerators. These folks, with our NAB as their mouthpiece, persuaded Congress to require the FCC to deregulate radio ownership using the ruse that the new Docket 80-90 FMs were not otherwise economically viable, just as PC-based automation was making it possible to run a station on a shoestring. The fruits of deregulation are now clear - Everyone loses. That’s the listening public, investors, lenders, advertisers, and thousands of broadcasters who once made radio great and were fired from jobs to which they were dedicated. For the most part, corporate radio is a hollow, bloodless shell replacing a medium that listeners once cared deeply about. Perhaps 2010 will be the year when real broadcasters are let back into their stations and we can begin to turn our medium around before it's too late.”
I have a one-word response.
Amen.
Don Keith
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Can someone explain for me the current NAB Ad campaign regarding
proposed "limits" on over-the-air
TV? The spots running on our local TV stations say that some
un-named organizations want to place limits on TV signals that come in through an antenna. If someone has information, please share it?
George Allgood, W4GFA
George, I have not seen those ads so I am not sure what they may reference. Here is a list of NAB's legislative priorities:
http://www.nab.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=14026 but I don't see anything that pertains, unless it is the one that begins on page 19.
Another push for them is here:
http://www.interferencezones.com/
Maybe one of these is what is leading to the ads. Or maybe someone else can enlighten us.
Thanks for stopping by and posting.
Don Keith N4KC
www.donkeith.com
www.n4kc.com
www.facebook.com/donkeith
Post a Comment